Known as George of Lydda, he was definitely a Christian – he was martyred for it in 303 AD. At the time the (Dalmatian) Roman Emperor in Turkey – where things were largely being organised – was Diocletian. Diocletian was deeply into his Roman pantheon. Followers of a monotheistic God were at risk.
George was a good fighter, and rose to high rank – all the way to Praetorian Guard – the protectors of the emperor. He was open about his monotheism – his Christianity. This caused him to be swept up in purges by the emperor. “Convert or die.” What fucker thinks that is a reason to kill people? But that’s the ancient Romans.
He was martyred in his home city of Lydda, hence his name, George of Lydda. This is the city of Lod in what was then called Syria Palaestina. There is a tomb in Lod, they claim to have relics. They tortured him, dragged him through the streets, and beheaded him.
His martyrdom was well respected by monotheists. Monotheists such as Muslims, Druze and Christians all venerate him for standing up against pantheism to the last, despite torture. His death was a rallying point and his name was eventually taken on as patron saint of many many countries. The Ukraine, Ethiopia, England, Bosnia, Malta, Bulgaria, and the republic of Genoa to name but a few. Even the cities of Moscow in Russia and Beirut in the Lebanon have him as their patron. He is venerated as martyr to Islam, Umbanda, Christianity, Santeria, and numerous orthodoxies and offshoots. His name is a rallying cry to hopeful Ukrainians, the dispossessed of parts of Africa, the displaced of Bosnia Herzegovina.
Just 75 years after his death, Theodosius Christianised the Roman emperor. George the Turkish Palestinian soldier would have been thrilled had he lived.
It is largely attributed to the Genoese Republic to connect a red cross on a white background to him. We find it referred to in the Genoese annals in 1198. His name was still a rallying cry. He died for Christ. A cross of blood on pure white seems appropriate. It was known as cruxata comunis Janue – the cross ensign of the commune of Genoa. They were a great seafaring nation around the time of what we call The Crusades.
1095 was when Pope Urban II proposed an armed pilgrimage to Jerusalem. Over 100 years of sustained attacks followed, with an eye to convert or die again, but this time by the Christians. See above opinion. A strange long complicated history, the crusades, not often taught. It was the making of many, the breaking of more. We established trade routes and systems that are still in place now – banks and pilgrimages. Shared symbols and linguistic hiccups. Templars and Camino. Amputation and complicated suturing. War brings innovation. Sustained war feeds a form of technological and cultural progress.
If you’re going by boat from England to the crusades, Genoa is gonna be a solid stop, but the Genoese fleet was dangerous. Best to have a pennant that prevents any misunderstanding. Richard I, the lionhearted king who barely set foot in England, took the Genoese flag and patron saint for England, for his crusaders, and to cement a positive relationship in an area where he spent much of his time. A cross of blood on pure white. A strong symbol for a bloody Christian crusade. English ships would be safe from hostility in the Mediterranean. It tallies when you look at the flags of other Christian sea powers in that region. Sardinia, Malta, Barcelona…
So this symbol of a Palestinian Turk found its way through Italy to England. And it is a symbol for Ukraine, and for the dispossessed over a large portion of this rich and varied globe.
Driving into Kent yesterday I saw many of these George Crosses. Perhaps a solidarity with the people of Kyiv specifically after the bombing, although it must be confusing as it is also a symbol for Moscow…
Some people seem to think the George cross is an exclusive symbol for their very inward looking personal and badly spelt idea of what “England” means. If you get them talking it’ll be confused and subjective but bits of their worldview will overlap. They don’t like people who have come over in boats, that’s likely to come up. In boats. Like the Normans, the Vikings, the Saxons, the Angles, the Jutes, the Celts and in fact everyone apart from perhaps the very early Neolithic flint napping hunter gatherers who would have roved to this land over Pangaean land bridges from what is now Mesopotamian Africa where all humanity originated. Essentially the only people who didn’t come in boats were cavemen. Perhaps that’s what the flags are trying to say. “We are cavemen.” You don’t need a flag to tell us that, darlings.
It’s nice to think that people who would otherwise be sitting on their arse are dragging those idle knuckles out into nature and doing arts and crafts in the sunshine. It can only help expand their thinking and their coordination. I think they might believe that doing it is some sort of an act of defiance or pride, but the problem with symbols is their meaning is subjective. They mean nothing more than what the observer takes from them.